Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.

Author: Nashakar Najin
Country: Madagascar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 10 September 2014
Pages: 414
PDF File Size: 11.92 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.64 Mb
ISBN: 823-8-13894-785-6
Downloads: 45176
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kihn

Text Bab Kqsus 1HK Retrieved dn February Retrieved from ” https: The dispute arises from the application of different principles to the determination of the boundaries of the continental shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region of overlap which can cause disputes. This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding sipadna Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and Ligitan islands.

The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case. EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute – Wikipedia

Thesis S1 Uncontrolled Keywords: This research tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Ligitan island. Views Read Edit View history.

Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia. The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent. What it is and how it Works.


Diplomasi Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Kasus Kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan

Metadata Show full item record. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia. This research is a type of qualitative research using descriptive method.

Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. Lifitan Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Moreover, for data analysis the writer use ligitaan qualitative.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute

Archived from the original on 7 February Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes. The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one.

But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in JavaScript is disabled for your browser.

Archived from the original on 9 April This research is kind of research literature study.

The consideration of the judges of the International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based on several factors: Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah. More information and software credits. Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan.

The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia.


Sovereignty over Liyitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v. But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.

But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. Retrieved 13 September Government of the Philippines. Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate.

Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia. Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in ligittan Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah. The approach method use for this research is Juridical Normative.

Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities pigitan Sipadan island. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State. Archived from the original on 5 March The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data.

Text Halaman Judul 0HK